New rules benefit air travelers

Discussion in 'General Discussion | Travel' started by uggboy, Sep 6, 2011.  |  Print Topic

  1. uggboy
    Original Member

    uggboy Gold Member

    Messages:
    50,181
    Likes Received:
    133,438
    Status Points:
    20,020
    http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/sep/06/new-rules-benefit-air-travelers/

    New rules recently went into effect for air travelers, and that's good news for passengers. These Department of Transportation rules cover tarmac waits, bumping, lost luggage and more.

    We already had a three-hour rule covering tarmac delays for domestic travel, but we now have protection on international flights that are delayed on U.S. airport tarmacs. International flights can't sit on the tarmac for more than four hours without allowing passengers to deplane, or the airline will be fined $27,500 per passenger.

    The airlines have incentive to follow this rule because of the steep fines. For example, a Boeing 777 jet (common on international routes) holds 300 passengers, so the fine would be more than $8 million for a full plane, and the new Airbus double-decker A380 can hold 555 passengers, which could cost more than $15 million if delayed. Of course, there are exceptions to the rule for safety, security or reasons related to air-traffic control.

    Unfortunately, the passengers who sit through a lengthy tarmac delay won't benefit. The government will pocket that $27,500 per passenger.
     
    JohnDeere19 likes this.
  2. mattsteg
    Original Member

    mattsteg Gold Member

    Messages:
    3,278
    Likes Received:
    5,543
    Status Points:
    4,170
    In most cases, I'd rather a 4:05 delay than a cancellation. Pretty sure no one wants planes sitting out on the tarmac - airline, passengers, government all want the plane in the air if possible. The hard limit has good and bad points.
     
    kwai and uggboy like this.
  3. kwai
    Original Member

    kwai Gold Member

    Messages:
    5,977
    Likes Received:
    12,916
    Status Points:
    11,070
    Why does the gov benefit from this? Shouldn't it be the passengers who are compensated for their inconvenience?
     
    uggboy likes this.
  4. uggboy
    Original Member

    uggboy Gold Member

    Messages:
    50,181
    Likes Received:
    133,438
    Status Points:
    20,020
    This will always be a mystery why the passengers seem to be on the receiving negative end, despite being the main characters who should receive some benefits instead!
     

Share This Page