Reading the piece that I had subsequently linked to in which Marriott records were the one's access, I still prefer the OP's not-fully-accurate story. But isn't this water already under the bridge? The OP drew attention to a story, and people contributed bits and pieces until what happened became clear. Why are we trying to crucify the OP for the manner in which s/he brought the story to our attention?
Last edited: Feb 12, 2014