InsideFlyer.com [English] United States InsideFlyer.uk [English] United Kingdom InsideFlyer.de [German] Germany InsideFlyer.no [Norwegian] Norway InsideFlyer.se [Swedish] Sweden InsideFlyer.dk [Danish] Denmark InsideFlyer.nl [Dutch] Benelux
Discussion in 'Kiva | Loans That Change Lives' started by tondoleo, May 17, 2012.
| Print Topic
Thank you fcj. You have done a very nice job in proving jbc's thesis that folks care a little bit less about impoverished men.
I will admit this thread reminded me of the need to keep my loans balanced. Before I found the world of expiring loans, the majority of my loans have been to women. Then it got tilted back in favour of Lebanese taxi drivers and Tajik farmers. Now somehow it's back to women. So going forward I am going to make a concerted effort to keep it balanced at 50/50 as there are a lot of men out there who need help to provide assistance to their families.
What does get on my goat is loans that are for females but the purpose is to provide funding to their husband's business.
Balance is hard to get, isn't it?
It is true that women often put their names forward when the loan is really for the family business or the husband. It is generally easier to fund that way.
Apparently the MFI's have provided all of the loan applicant's with fcjapan's lending modus operandi regarding his predilection to loan to the women.
Or, for a slightly different take, the impact of Grameen and its illustrious founder cannot be overstated. The historical premise there was women working together sharing their assistance, something men of the region were not famed for being able to do. Since then the performance of women in this arena has been better than men. Ignoring issues such as loan purposes, loan size and tenor the data I have seen suggests there is not too much difference, none statistically. However, women do tend to borrow for shorter tenors, lesser amounts and for inherently self-liquidating purposes such as store inventory or seasonal seeds, etc. Men are much more prone to borrow for equipment and infrastructure, which cost more, require longer tenors and have much less direct, immediate repayment source.
Thus, the bias persists.
The preceding, as usual, are my opinions. I do not represent them as facts, although I believe them to be.
It has been 41 days since this thread has been created. To date our Kiva liaison has not responded. For shame.