While channel surfing for weather, I just caught a segment about SQ in a program that seems to be about luxury travel bargains. The claim is that one should fly SQ in J/C rather than IFC, for existence SIN-SYD RT $3K versus $5K. (I don't know whether these prices are current/accurate.) The shock to me was the following claims: Same wine list; they even showed a Singapore Girl pouring Dom to a passenger in what they claimed was a business class seat. (Certainly not true, especially for champagne and the French reds, which are much better in FC.) Same food. (Caviar in C/J? Not IME. Also BTC on the website gives different choices for the classes, including a different lobster.) Flat beds in J/C (Depends on the aircraft I guess, but I've never been lucky) but your seat is your bed. (Is this not true in FC except for the old UA IFC with the blocked off seats?) Same Singapore Girls (This one is true, although slightly more senior and distinctly better service in FC as a general rule.) If the Travel Channel is going to do programs like this, they should check their facts and get the details right. If anyone has ever travelled much in premium classes, these claims are a joke. The premise might be correct in that for some, the difference between J/C and FC is minor and not worth the price difference, but the claims here are a joke and could lead to great disappointment with SQ, that apparently cooperated with the show by providing aircraft and staff for filming.