AA and QF seek ATI

Discussion in 'American Airlines | AAdvantage' started by JALPak, May 11, 2011.  |  Print Topic

  1. JALPak
    Original Member

    JALPak Gold Member

    Messages:
    152,236
    Likes Received:
    53,266
    Status Points:
    20,020
    http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/05/american-airlines-qantas-airwa.html

     
  2. DestinationDavid
    Original Member

    DestinationDavid Milepoint Guide

    Messages:
    6,846
    Likes Received:
    12,715
    Status Points:
    11,770
  3. JALPak
    Original Member

    JALPak Gold Member

    Messages:
    152,236
    Likes Received:
    53,266
    Status Points:
    20,020
    Yea just better schedule for AA folks and nothing in return. They know why you fly right? ;)
     
  4. DestinationDavid
    Original Member

    DestinationDavid Milepoint Guide

    Messages:
    6,846
    Likes Received:
    12,715
    Status Points:
    11,770
    Oz/NZ routes have never been too high on my wish list. I'd rather see more Asian and some African routes. But, that's just me. ;)

    All kidding aside though, a JBV application doesn't make sense unless AA is at least thinking of flying its metal to Oz/NZ. This might be a positive sign....
     
  5. tom911
    Original Member

    tom911 Gold Member

    Messages:
    2,005
    Likes Received:
    3,183
    Status Points:
    2,070
    Interesting analysis in the Australian press:

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...s-to-some-cities/story-e6frg95x-1226054887060
     
  6. Simon
    Original Member

    Simon Milepoint Guide

    Messages:
    3,228
    Likes Received:
    2,540
    Status Points:
    1,670
    They are pulling out of Asia and going US! Qantas currently has no ATIs with any airlines right?
     
  7. JALPak
    Original Member

    JALPak Gold Member

    Messages:
    152,236
    Likes Received:
    53,266
    Status Points:
    20,020
    But they do have JBV with BA if I recall correctly
     
  8. Tenmoc
    Original Member

    Tenmoc Gold Member

    Messages:
    31,882
    Likes Received:
    212,880
    Status Points:
    20,020
    Well I am happy they're moving forward, but all these JBVs are for the airlines not the passengers.

    Although there have been minor improvements.

    What I'm waiting for is IB code mistakes to Australia.
     
  9. Simon
    Original Member

    Simon Milepoint Guide

    Messages:
    3,228
    Likes Received:
    2,540
    Status Points:
    1,670
    It would seem it's always a catch 22. You get some new benefits but yes in the end it's all for the airlines rather than the customer.
     
    Tenmoc likes this.
  10. anabolism
    Original Member

    anabolism Gold Member

    Messages:
    1,403
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Status Points:
    1,120
    I'd love to see AA fly to HKG. That would open up lots of travel for upgrades. Personally, Australia is one of my favorite places to visit, so an AA flight would be great. Back when an ex-US Circle Pacific was $5k in business, it was feasible to go to Australia on a mileage run/short vacation. But now, with RT business fares in the $11k range, we can only go as part of an ex-non-US DONEx.
    Why would fares be reduced?

    I wonder if business fares might go down?

    The link includes:

    But according to AA, it has no intention of entering the route and the airlines argue this means it is not a true competitor and there is no detriment to competition from the deal. They argue that an enhanced relationship is needed to reinvigorate competition and say they would continue the existing codeshare if the alliance is rejected, but it would have "inherent limitations".

    So, AA is saying they won't be flying there.
     
  11. DestinationDavid
    Original Member

    DestinationDavid Milepoint Guide

    Messages:
    6,846
    Likes Received:
    12,715
    Status Points:
    11,770
    I tend to focus on it being a JBV with ATI. They could just apply for the ATI, which would accomplish the linking schedules portion that they want to do. Going for the JBV only makes sense if eventually they'd want to share revenue on flights, and they'd only be sharing revenue if there was revenue to share, i.e. AA enters the market.

    So if AA actually isn't planning on entering the market, why not just get ATI and not go through the trouble of JBV? I could be completely wrong, but maybe AA doesn't plan on entering the market. Yet.

    Or I'm totally off, one or the other. :)
     

Share This Page