A380 engine inspections may be doing more harm than good

Discussion in 'Qantas Airways | Frequent Flyer' started by Chimpy, Mar 4, 2011.  |  Print Topic

  1. Chimpy
    Original Member

    Chimpy Gold Member

    Messages:
    43,597
    Likes Received:
    228,734
    Status Points:
    20,020
    From the SMH

    http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel...arm-than-good-20110305-1biip.html?from=smh_sb

    Europe's air safety regulator has lifted the requirement for frequent, repetitive engine inspections of Rolls-Royce engines fitted to the Airbus A380 superjumbo, partly out of concern the inspections could now be doing more harm than good.
    In the wake of the engine explosion under the wing of Qantas flight QF32 on November 4, the European Aviation Safety Agency required that Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engines fitted to Airbus A380s be inspected for oil leaks every 20 to 100 flights.
    The relaxation comes despite Australian safety investigators launching new investigations into oil leaks in two Trent 900 engines on separate Qantas planes last month.
    [story continues at the link above]
     
    Horse likes this.
  2. Pinkmoose
    Original Member

    Pinkmoose Silver Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    26
    Status Points:
    145
    This sounds really strange (after reading the full article). It states that by removing the tubing where the oil leaks are supposed to have occured, you can actually crack the tube, causing it to fail.

    Wouldn't you have thought that Rolls Royce would have spent a bit more money and put in something made from a stronger or more resiliant material?
     
  3. Mal
    Original Member

    Mal Silver Member

    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    352
    Status Points:
    435
    Presume that mistake was done by ALAEA licenced mechanics at an Australian facility., otherwise a certain Steve Purvinas would have been all over the media pointing it out!!
     

Share This Page