FL Trump For President Lounge
Democrats are delusional. They try to destroy President Donald Trump. They try to ruin Trump. It never works. No matter how hard they try, they can’t beat Trump.
Let me give you a great example. Three Sundays ago, I was busy watching NFL football when my phone rang. “Are you watching Fox News?” my buddy Lee asked. “Turn it on. It’s the most amazing thing I’ve ever seen in politics. Go there now!”
Sure enough, Lee was right. I’ve never seen anything like it. I would not have believed it if I didn’t see it with my own eyes.
There was President Trump in a Houston football stadium giving a speech to 50,000 people, most of them Indian immigrants. Yes, I said 50,000. It was NRG Stadium, home to the Houston Texans. And it was full — as if there were an NFL game going on. Trump is as popular as the NFL on a Sunday morning … with Indian immigrants.
Keep in mind the Democrat presidential front-runners rarely get more than a few hundred fans to show up. Trump routinely gets 10,000 to 20,000. But the press explains it away by saying, “It’s a sea of white faces.”
But these weren’t white faces. These were 50,000 dark-skinned immigrants from India, now proud Americans. And they love Trump. They screamed his name — “Trump, Trump, Trump!” They gave him standing ovations. This was clearly a once-in-a-lifetime phenomenon.
India’s prime minister stood on stage, arm in arm with Trump, while the crowd cheered Trump’s name. Trump could have run for prime minister of India at that moment and won. Amazing.
And hardly anyone in the mainstream media reported this once-in-a-lifetime event.
Doesn’t the media claim Trump is hated by people of color? Yet here were Indian Americans cheering for Trump as if he were the king of Indian immigrants.
It was like a Billy Graham revival.
More proof of how Trump is changing politics. Forget polls. Every day, I speak to Hispanics and blacks who love Trump.
Trump’s not losing in 2020. And I believe, deep down, Democrats know that. That’s why they are rushing to frame him and impeach him. It won’t work. Let me explain why.
Impeachment has only three outcomes. In each case, Trump wins.
First, House Democrats try to impeach Trump but can’t muster enough votes to impeach. They look like overreaching fools and sore losers. Trump wins by an electoral landslide in 2020.
Second, the House impeaches Trump but the Senate acquits him. Democrats look like overreaching fools and sore losers. Trump wins by an electoral landslide in 2020.
Third, the House impeaches. Then, a jealous, bitter Mitt Romney leads a RINO revolt against Trump in the Senate. They convict Trump. He’s removed from office.
Guess what happens next? Impeachment and conviction removes a president, but it doesn’t disqualify him from holding future office. Result? Trump runs as an independent and is reelected president when all 63 million Trump voters leave the GOP to support Trump.
Trump gets revenge by destroying the GOP. Romney and the GOP don’t get 5 million votes. The GOP goes the way of the Whigs. And Trump campaigns against every GOP senator who voted against him, ending all of their careers.
In each case, Trump wins.
My advice to the GOP Senate: Cross Trump at your own peril. A vote to convict Trump is a vote to destroy the GOP and end your Senate career in disgrace.
And my advice to Romney: Find a new party. You are a disgrace and an embarrassment to me and 63 million Trump voters.
You’ll never believe who one expert believes will become President in 2020:
It’s not Hillary… Elizabeth Warren… A.O.C. or even Michelle Obama.
And if she wins, she’ll take away our freedoms and destroy our economy.
So if you were put off by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign… or couldn’t believe how popular Bernie Sanders’ socialist platform was – just wait.
This 2020 candidate will “out-liberal” anything you’ve ever seen.
A new, incredibly powerful hidden force will practically guarantee that she wins.
And the steps she’ll take during her first 100 days in office will send our nation into one of the worst financial crises in history… creating a nightmare for Baby Boomers.
Senior Researcher, Stansberry Research
P.S. We’ve identified 3 initiatives that have already become the biggest talking point of the next election. Find out why this is a problem here.
|Prior to being recalled as ambassador to Ukraine in the spring Yovanovitch reportedly created a list of individuals who were to be monitored via social media and other means. Ukraine embassy staff made the request to the Washington D.C. headquarters office of the department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs. After several days, Yovanovitch’s staff was informed that the request was illegal and the monitoring either ceased or was concealed via the State Department Global Engagement Center, which has looser restrictions on collecting information.|
Judicial Watch Fights in Court to Depose Hillary Clinton
On August 22, 2019, the court then ruled that Clinton and Mills had 30 days to oppose being questioned in person under oath by Judicial Watch related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Additionally, Judicial Watch was granted seven new depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests. In granting the additional discovery, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth commented: “I’ll tell you everything they’ve discovered in this period raises serious questions about what the hell the State Department’s doing here.”
Judicial Watch Files Two New Lawsuits Seeking Records of How CFIUS Investments by Ukraine, China Firms Tied to Hunter Biden
Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President Joe Biden, is reported to be one of nine directors of BHR Partners, which was registered 12 days after the vice president’s son, in December 2013, flew to Beijing aboard Air Force Two, while his father made an official visit as vice president. Hunter Biden, then-chairman of the private equity firm Rosemont Seneca, reportedly signed a deal with the Chinese government-owned Bank of China to set up the BHR $1 billion joint venture investment fund.
You have an interesting point that I want to put up on the screen that seems to demonstrate exactly the point you're making," Wallace said. "Between 2001 and 2012, Bill Clinton made 13 speeches, 13, for which he was paid $500,000 or more. Eleven of those 13 speeches were at least eight years after he left the presidency while his wife was secretary of state."
Schweizer responded, noting that Bill Clinton’s speaking fees "dramatically" went up when Hillary Clinton, now a presidential candidate, took office in 2009.
"When you have one or two examples, it's a coincidence," he said. "When you have this many, to me it's a trend."
We aren’t going to dig into the truthfulness of Schweizer’s overall thesis here. But we are interested in Bill Clinton’s speaking fees while Hillary Clinton was at the State Department. His book says,"Of the 13 Clinton speeches that fetched $500,000 or more, only two occurred during the years his wife was not secretary of state," according to the New York Times, which has an advance copy.
By the millions
In 2014, before Clinton Cash was in the public eye, the Washington Postanalyzed Clinton’s speaking fees and found he made at least $104 million in speaking fees between 2001 through 2012 -- more than half of that income came from speeches in foreign countries (though he gave more speeches within the United States).
Attitude and Ability is everything, without Government Laws we would all be equal, until we are Influenced by others.